Everything in today's world carries within it what makes us doubt and believe at the same time!... This "science" and its wide-ranging progress may tempt some to look at religion as if in its absence something from ancient superstitions.. and some may see in it a sure and direct reason for the ability of The One Creator, the Mighty and Sublime, is in application of the words of God Almighty, “Only among His servants are scholars who fear God.” Here we find in the picture doubt and certainty born from the same point, but after that they are two paths that will never meet. of conditions. The journey between the two extremes requires a strong will, an enlightened mind, and a sound heart.. It may then require a great ability to explain, argue, and describe in order to show what happened in the upheaval and the equilibrium that followed it. The dark person reaches its end in the presence of the light, so he tastes the sweetness of faith, and he talks about it in this book, rather in all of his books.. But he does not tell them about his greatness, but rather presents them with philosophical issues full of problems and their solutions. And in this book, we find him grasping the issue of “God” the Almighty, following it from the point of atheism or disbelief in the Divine Essence... up to believing in it and being attached wholeheartedly to everything that has anything to do with that. He presents it as a believer who obeys philosophy for his faith or a philosopher who knows faith in his heart.
I refused to worship God because I was absorbed in the worship of myself and admired the flash of light that began to flash in my mind with the opening of consciousness and the beginning of awakening from the cradle of childhood.
This psychological state was behind the controversial scene that is repeated every day.. I also missed the origins of logic while I was treating logic and did not realize that I contradict myself as I acknowledge the Creator and then say, Whoever created the Creator, I make of him a creature at the time when I call him a Creator, which is sophistry in particular.
Moreover, to say a first cause of existence requires that this cause be necessary for existence in itself and is not dependent or in need of anything else in order to exist. As for the fact that the cause needs a cause, this makes it one of the links of causation and does not make it a first cause.
These are the dimensions of the philosophical issue that ended with Aristotle saying the first cause and the first motive for existence.
These dimensions were not clear in my mind at the time.
I had not yet known who Aristotle was, nor what the first laws of logic and dialectics were.
And it took thirty years, with drowning in books, and thousands of nights of solitude, meditation, dialogue with oneself, reconsideration, then reconsideration, reconsidering the fire... Then turning the thought on every face to cut the thorny path from God and man to the mystery of life to the mystery of death to what I write today from Words on the path of certainty. It was not easy...because I did not want to take it easy.
And if I had listened to the voice of instinct and let intuition lead me, I would have relieved myself of the trouble of controversy.. and instinct would have led me to God.. But I came at a time when everything became complicated and the voice of instinct became weak until it became a whisper and the voice of reason rose until it became arrogance, arrogance and arrogance.. and the mind is excused for its extravagance. When he sees himself standing on a huge pyramid of achievements, and when he sees himself as a donor of civilization, including industry, electricity, missiles, planes, and submarines, and when he sees himself breaking into land, sea, air, water, and underwater. On what he knows and what he does not know.
I refused to worship God because I was absorbed in the worship of myself and admired the flash of light that began to flash in my mind with the opening of consciousness and the beginning of awakening from the cradle of childhood.
This psychological state was behind the controversial scene that is repeated every day.. I also missed the origins of logic while I was treating logic and did not realize that I contradict myself as I acknowledge the Creator and then say, Whoever created the Creator, I make of him a creature at the time when I call him a Creator, which is sophistry in particular.
Moreover, to say a first cause of existence requires that this cause be necessary for existence in itself and is not dependent or in need of anything else in order to exist. As for the fact that the cause needs a cause, this makes it one of the links of causation and does not make it a first cause.
These are the dimensions of the philosophical issue that ended with Aristotle saying the first cause and the first motive for existence.
These dimensions were not clear in my mind at the time.
I had not yet known who Aristotle was, nor what the first laws of logic and dialectics were.
And it took thirty years, with drowning in books, and thousands of nights of solitude, meditation, dialogue with oneself, reconsideration, then reconsideration, reconsidering the fire... Then turning the thought on every face to cut the thorny path from God and man to the mystery of life to the mystery of death to what I write today from Words on the path of certainty. It was not easy...because I did not want to take it easy.
And if I had listened to the voice of instinct and let intuition lead me, I would have relieved myself of the trouble of controversy.. and instinct would have led me to God.. But I came at a time when everything became complicated and the voice of instinct became weak until it became a whisper and the voice of reason rose until it became arrogance, arrogance and arrogance.. and the mind is excused for its extravagance. When he sees himself standing on a huge pyramid of achievements, and when he sees himself as a donor of civilization, including industry, electricity, missiles, planes, and submarines, and when he sees himself breaking into land, sea, air, water, and underwater. On what he knows and what he does not know.
Show More
