Reasons to study LEET properly
Since LEET is an aptitude test, you cannot improve your score simply by repeating the problem. We will tell you exactly the four types of LEET, and accordingly, what part of each type you need to pay attention to, and what judgment method is required to find the correct answer in time.
Class points for each type
In the case of the'inference' type, it is the type that asks whether the judgment being asked by the prophet is possible based on the contents of the presentation. Candidates are not to judge the prophets based on their understanding, but rather based on the presentation. You should think that in court the judge is making a decision based on the text and evidence.
In the case of the'argumentation' type, it is a type that asks to evaluate the relationship between the story spoken by the speaker or the writer in the presentation and the content of the prophet. Candidates must learn the judgment method appropriate for each specific type. In my lecture, the arguments (strengthening/weakening, refutation, premise, tacit premise, derivation, negation) and similar arguments (consent, support, accept, more than, compatible, disagree, agree). It deals with how the questions are different and how you should judge in each type.
In the case of data interpretation (reparative reasoning), the most important thing is what information the candidates can derive from the data presented in the presentation. It covers where to focus on the data in the presentation, and what information you can derive for each piece of data.
In the case of logic games, the number of cases, judgment of liars, judgment of order, and logical relations are classified in detail, and then the method that the candidates can effectively utilize without missing the given information is covered.
Course target and expected class effect
For beginners, just by taking this class, you will be able to clearly understand how reasoning and argumentation differs from the existing language test and how to improve your score.
For those who are more than lucky, when you take this lecture, you will understand the type and characteristics of the presentation of reasoning arguments, the type of prophesies, and the required judgment method, so that you can approach the problem according to the way of thinking required by that type. There will be. As soon as you see the problem or see the prophet, if you do not come up with the required way of thinking as the type of reasoning argument is classified in your head, I am sorry, but I must see that it cannot be considered that the way of thinking necessary for reasoning argument has been acquired.
How to use the lecture
Before taking the class, it is more effective if you take the lecture while addressing the issues that will be covered in the lecture first, indicating which parts were important to read and what were confused. You will be able to clearly compare which parts of the presentation you need to read carefully and how accurate and mechanical judgments are made, and the lecture is structured so that you can fully learn the reading method and judgment method just by taking this lecture. I did it.
In addition, the application'LEET FACTORY', which is scheduled to be released during January 2021, will allow you to view the explanations of previous issues after 2016 for free (iOS will be released on February 2021). Students who have taken this class can easily see how the logic and solution methods covered in the class apply to other problems. A post-mortem commentary on a specific problem sounds good when you hear it, but it is true that it is difficult to apply when you solve other problems. It would be good if you study while checking how the logic handled in class applies to other existing problems.
Questions to be dealt with (use the previous year 2019-2021 to the maximum)
1. Reasoning
end. Legal
Number 9 in 2021. 7 in 2020, 10 in 2020, 8 in 2016, 12 in 2019, 11 in 2019, 1 in 2019
I. General reasoning type (including inclusion type and judgment type)
2021 18, 2021 38, 2021 40, 2020 15, 2020 39, 2018 21, 2016 9, 2016 28, 2019 21, 2019 14, No. 29 in 2020,
2. Argument type
end. Argumentation
1 in 2021, 15 in 2021, 27 in 2020, 11 in 2016, 16 in 2017, 18 in 2018, 2 in 2021, 12 in 2016, 33 in 2021, 20 in 2019
I. Pseudo-argumentation
15 times in 2016, 18 times in 2018, 22 times in 2020, 16 times in 2021, 20 times in 2021, 5 times in 2019, 22 times in 2019, 20 times in 2018, 20 times in 2016, 5 times in 2020, 6 in 2019, 10 in 2014
3. Data analysis
Numbers 25 in 2021, 34 in 2021, 17 in 2019, 37 in 2020, 33 in 2018, 39 in 2019, 23 in 2020, 40 in 2020
4. Logic game
32 times in 2020, 33 times in 2020, 31 times in 2020, 32 times in 2019, 22 times in 2021
Since LEET is an aptitude test, you cannot improve your score simply by repeating the problem. We will tell you exactly the four types of LEET, and accordingly, what part of each type you need to pay attention to, and what judgment method is required to find the correct answer in time.
Class points for each type
In the case of the'inference' type, it is the type that asks whether the judgment being asked by the prophet is possible based on the contents of the presentation. Candidates are not to judge the prophets based on their understanding, but rather based on the presentation. You should think that in court the judge is making a decision based on the text and evidence.
In the case of the'argumentation' type, it is a type that asks to evaluate the relationship between the story spoken by the speaker or the writer in the presentation and the content of the prophet. Candidates must learn the judgment method appropriate for each specific type. In my lecture, the arguments (strengthening/weakening, refutation, premise, tacit premise, derivation, negation) and similar arguments (consent, support, accept, more than, compatible, disagree, agree). It deals with how the questions are different and how you should judge in each type.
In the case of data interpretation (reparative reasoning), the most important thing is what information the candidates can derive from the data presented in the presentation. It covers where to focus on the data in the presentation, and what information you can derive for each piece of data.
In the case of logic games, the number of cases, judgment of liars, judgment of order, and logical relations are classified in detail, and then the method that the candidates can effectively utilize without missing the given information is covered.
Course target and expected class effect
For beginners, just by taking this class, you will be able to clearly understand how reasoning and argumentation differs from the existing language test and how to improve your score.
For those who are more than lucky, when you take this lecture, you will understand the type and characteristics of the presentation of reasoning arguments, the type of prophesies, and the required judgment method, so that you can approach the problem according to the way of thinking required by that type. There will be. As soon as you see the problem or see the prophet, if you do not come up with the required way of thinking as the type of reasoning argument is classified in your head, I am sorry, but I must see that it cannot be considered that the way of thinking necessary for reasoning argument has been acquired.
How to use the lecture
Before taking the class, it is more effective if you take the lecture while addressing the issues that will be covered in the lecture first, indicating which parts were important to read and what were confused. You will be able to clearly compare which parts of the presentation you need to read carefully and how accurate and mechanical judgments are made, and the lecture is structured so that you can fully learn the reading method and judgment method just by taking this lecture. I did it.
In addition, the application'LEET FACTORY', which is scheduled to be released during January 2021, will allow you to view the explanations of previous issues after 2016 for free (iOS will be released on February 2021). Students who have taken this class can easily see how the logic and solution methods covered in the class apply to other problems. A post-mortem commentary on a specific problem sounds good when you hear it, but it is true that it is difficult to apply when you solve other problems. It would be good if you study while checking how the logic handled in class applies to other existing problems.
Questions to be dealt with (use the previous year 2019-2021 to the maximum)
1. Reasoning
end. Legal
Number 9 in 2021. 7 in 2020, 10 in 2020, 8 in 2016, 12 in 2019, 11 in 2019, 1 in 2019
I. General reasoning type (including inclusion type and judgment type)
2021 18, 2021 38, 2021 40, 2020 15, 2020 39, 2018 21, 2016 9, 2016 28, 2019 21, 2019 14, No. 29 in 2020,
2. Argument type
end. Argumentation
1 in 2021, 15 in 2021, 27 in 2020, 11 in 2016, 16 in 2017, 18 in 2018, 2 in 2021, 12 in 2016, 33 in 2021, 20 in 2019
I. Pseudo-argumentation
15 times in 2016, 18 times in 2018, 22 times in 2020, 16 times in 2021, 20 times in 2021, 5 times in 2019, 22 times in 2019, 20 times in 2018, 20 times in 2016, 5 times in 2020, 6 in 2019, 10 in 2014
3. Data analysis
Numbers 25 in 2021, 34 in 2021, 17 in 2019, 37 in 2020, 33 in 2018, 39 in 2019, 23 in 2020, 40 in 2020
4. Logic game
32 times in 2020, 33 times in 2020, 31 times in 2020, 32 times in 2019, 22 times in 2021
Show More
