AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 2.3. Trustworthiness 84 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 25 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★☆☆☆
2.3
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
0%
4 star
50%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
50%
What to know
✓
Low review manipulation risk
25% review manipulation risk
✓
Credible reviews
84% trustworthiness score from analyzed reviews
⚠
Mixed user feedback
Average 2.3★ rating suggests room for improvement
About WikiExplorer for Wikipedia
Features:
• Explore Wikipedia using a beautiful interface
• Save articles for offline reading
• Resume reading where you left off
• Listen to articles using TTS (Text-to-speech)
• Night mode
• Organize your articles in collections
• View nearby articles on a map, using your device's GPS
• Search Wikipedia for articles
• Support for almost all Wikipedia languages
• Full-screen mode
• And more to come...
WikiExplorer is frequently updated with new features, and we're taking requests too (more info below)
Request new features on our feedback site, we would love to hear from you!
http://wikiexplorer.uservoice.com/
WikiExplorer for Wikipedia Screenshots
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for WikiExplorer for Wikipedia
Contemporarium
Waste of hard drive space
I've never given an app one star before because even if it has bugs or something you can at least tell they tried. I even feel bad for writing this one..but I feel it's necessary. For one, it is one of the most ugly interfaces I've ever seen. It reminds me of a website made in the 90s. But I could probably get past that if there was a reason this app did something special the other one hasn't added..but it doesn't. It is literally just an ugly version of the regular Wikipedia app (that's FREE). I only got it to check it out because it was free for a day and it seemed to have a cool concept..but it doesn't. Seriously..it's a downgrade from the free one. Sorry for being harsh..it just needs a LOT of work.
RonJ109
Nice App
Nice app, but how do you change the rate of speed for the text to speech setting? The speaking voice is too slow. Other than that I would give this app a 5 star.
