AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 2.2. Trustworthiness 65 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 21 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★☆☆☆
2.2
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
18%
4 star
0%
3 star
18%
2 star
0%
1 star
64%
What to know
✓
Low review manipulation risk
21% review manipulation risk
⚠
Mixed user feedback
Average 2.1★ rating suggests room for improvement
About Clinical Pharmacology by CK
- Supporting users in making informed medication decisions
- Protecting patient safety
- Increasing productivity
To get started with Elsevier Clinical Pharmacology powered by ClinicalKey
1. Download the free Elsevier Clinical Pharmacology powered by ClinicalKey App
2. Sign in securely using your Clinical Pharmacology powered by ClinicalKey or Institution account
Designed with advanced technology and insight from extensive customer research, Clinical Pharmacology powered by ClinicalKey also enhances the user experience with Smart Search for top speed to answers, deep access to trusted evidence, and the ability to absorb relevant content quicker for optimal point-of-care productivity.
Immediate access to important updates
Provides important updates even on weekends and holidays, which is unique among drug references. This helps organizations avoid harmful and costly medication errors and safeguard patients.
Superior quality content
Evidence-based, peer-reviewed content developed by pharmacist editors with expertise in their therapeutic areas ensures superior quality.
Top speed-to-answer for quick, confident decisions
No other drug reference provides point-of-care answers faster, for rapid yet well-informed decisions that contribute to the highest caliber patient care.
All inclusive, enterprise-wide solution
Delivers drug monographs including neonatal/pediatric content, patient education, IV compatibility, toxicology, drug class overviews, CMS approved oncology content, custom reports and more.
Clinical Pharmacology by CK Screenshots
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for Clinical Pharmacology by CK
Andrew23600952
Poor Quality and Functionality
The nightmare of trying to get “mobile access” aside (a hassle which is frankly not worth it given that this app is just a repackaged web browser loaded only with the website), it doesn’t work very well. I would recommend anyone who’s interested to just use the website, because this app is rather useless and difficult to work with.
Matthew Stathis
How did this even get approved on the App Store??
“Section 4.2 – Minimum Functionality” of the App Store guidelines pretty much ban publishing an app that’s just a re-wrapped version of a mobile website so no idea how this garbage app even got approved by Apple lol