AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 2.4. Trustworthiness 0 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 0 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★☆☆☆
2.4
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
13%
4 star
6%
3 star
19%
2 star
31%
1 star
31%
What to know
⚠
Mixed user feedback
Average 2.4★ rating suggests room for improvement
About Hemeonc Questions
We are humbled that since we launched the website in 2014, over 9000+ Hematologists/Oncologists have signed up for our site including many international doctors. Our subscription network has expanded to almost every Academic Medical Centers and Oncology Fellowship program in the USA. Many foreign doctors also find this very helpful to prepare for their respective boards.
Why HOQB:
1. Efficient and High Yield
2. Constantly Updates
3. The Best Board Exam Preparation Guide.
4. Value
5. Adjunct Resource.
Hemeonc Questions Screenshots
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for Hemeonc Questions
PDL1 TPS
Buggy app, Qbank full of mistakes
As others have pointed out, the app doesn’t work. Answer choices after the first 5 don’t display. The Qbank itself is full of typos, formatting errors, and broken answers. Additionally, throughout the Qbank, there is an odd focus on knowing things that are technically in the NCCN guidelines, but nobody would ever use outside of unusual circumstances. The Qbank itself is fine for studying, but with all the mistakes it is very bad for practice exams.
Entisar saleh
V,good
It is scientifically very good and updated , but I wish I could save the practice question progress , please solve this problem.
