AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 4.3. Trustworthiness 81 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 23 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★★★☆
4.3
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
56%
4 star
31%
3 star
0%
2 star
6%
1 star
6%
What to know
✓
Low review manipulation risk
23% review manipulation risk
✓
Credible reviews
81% trustworthiness score from analyzed reviews
✓
High user satisfaction
88% of sampled ratings are 4+ stars (4.3★ average)
About Falconry Journal
Falconry Journal also lets you export your data so that you can further analyze it in any way you choose, making that paper journal completely obsolete!
A subscription is required to use Falconry Journal and all features within. You will be prompted to subscribe after you create an account.
By using Falconry Journal you agree to the terms of use found here: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
To read more about our data privacy policy, that can be found here: https://www.falconryjournal.com/privacy-policy/
Falconry Journal Screenshots
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for Falconry Journal
Notsohappydudeontinder
Owner makes false claims using data from the app
The founder of this app Tim Williams spreads false claims all over different falconry groups to bring attention to his app. He has claimed that red tails are the hardest bird to find a proper hunt weight, kestrels have slow metabolisms, and he loves to argue complete nonsense to promote his app. As a man of principle I cannot support an app that is run by such a lunatic.
Kittiwake15
Really great app! (Two minor suggestions)
A really useful app and impressively accurate predictions! It was predicting my Harris’s Hawks weights almost always accurately with only like a week of data. I’ve also been using it for the education ambassador raptors I work with to try and get a better handle on their weights. There are two things I personally would like to see added when the developer gets a chance: 1. A setting for birds housed indoors. I am tracking one bird housed outside and I like the automatic temperature input based on location, but I think it may be messing with the weight predictions for the other two birds who are housed in heated buildings. I’m considering turning off location again and manually inputting temps for all three, but it would be nice if there was a setting to set a consistent temperature for specific birds. 2. It would be nice if the type of food fed could be taken into account (or an option to track food calories instead of weight). Some food items like rat are significantly higher calorie than others like chick and I think I’m going to have to manually start correcting for this because I think it might be messing with predictions.