2025 AAA Annual Meeting
American Anthropological Association
2.7 ★
30 ratings
Free
AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 2.7. Trustworthiness 59 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 28 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★☆☆☆
2.7
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
40%
4 star
0%
3 star
3%
2 star
3%
1 star
53%
What to know
⚠
Mixed user feedback
Average 2.7★ rating suggests room for improvement
About 2025 AAA Annual Meeting
Use the app to:
-Browse the complete meeting schedule and filter by day, track, or interest
-Create your own custom agenda and receive reminders
-Access session information, speaker bios, and presentation materials
-Connect with fellow attendees, exhibitors, and presenters
-Stay updated with announcements and important event information
Download the app today to make the most of your Annual Meeting experience.
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for 2025 AAA Annual Meeting
Miss my sleep records
Awkwarder than papah
Such a huge learning curve and so limiting! Can’t flip back and forth easily when trying to manage attending multiple sessions. Multi-step process to figure out what time within a session a particular speaker is likely to be. And if I need to keep personal appointments I can’t write them down here—so I have to juggle the paper maps, my outlook calendar, the app….. and I am missing things I would have liked to know about. Having to scroll through every paper and board title takes forever, making planning ahead difficult. Have to have topic or person in mind to search for.
Eclectic2019
Problematic searchability
The app only lists presenters who are giving formal papers, whereas at least a third if not, they half of the sessions were round tables and other kinds of events. Every name that’s listed on the program should be searchable. Also within a session, when you find it, if you click on the title of the presentation within the section, you don’t see who the presenter for that title is. The only way to find the presenter is to go back up to the session title and click on presentation details. So the inconsistency between linking names with paper titles is problematic
