AppRecs review analysis
AppRecs rating 4.2. Trustworthiness 75 out of 100. Review manipulation risk 26 out of 100. Based on a review sample analyzed.
★★★★☆
4.2
AppRecs Rating
Ratings breakdown
5 star
67%
4 star
17%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
17%
What to know
✓
Low review manipulation risk
26% review manipulation risk
✓
Credible reviews
75% trustworthiness score from analyzed reviews
✓
High user satisfaction
83% of sampled ratings are 4+ stars (4.2★ average)
About SafeSkin: AI Beauty Scanner
Key Features:
AI Beauty Scanner: Harnessing the latest in AI technology, SafeSkin can analyze the ingredients of your skincare and cosmetic products to help you make informed choices.
Dermatology Expertise: Access to expert insights and advice on how to maintain healthy, youthful skin.
Ingredient Checker: Quickly and easily scan product labels to identify potentially harmful ingredients, ensuring your skin's safety.
Product Comparison: Compare products based on their ingredients and potential effects on your skin.
Allergy Alerts: Receive alerts for common allergens and irritants found in skincare and cosmetic products.
Trusted Resources: Integrates with well-known platforms for comprehensive product information.
Whether you're a skincare enthusiast looking to enhance your routine or someone concerned about the products you use, SafeSkin is your go-to app for safe and healthy skincare choices. Download SafeSkin now and take control of your skin's well-being.
Privacy Policy: https://newintco.com/policy/
Terms of Use: https://newintco.com/terms-of-use/
SafeSkin: AI Beauty Scanner Screenshots
Tap to Rate:
Reviews for SafeSkin: AI Beauty Scanner
JasonBenns
Please make it work
Current database is limited and I am not sure it’s working atm
Gigihi2023
Not enough products
This app has a very small window for a free trial but honestly the fact that very common products are not on this app makes it completely useless. Probably should offer for free until you get a broad spectrum of items. Cerave was recommended by my dermatologist and that is very common so should be here.